Sociopathy and Evil

“According to Nazi ideology, Untermenschen—subhumans, as they were called, a designation that included Jews, Gypsies, homosexuals, Poles, Slavs, Russian prisoners of war, the handicapped, the mentally ill, and others—were no different from white mice or lab rabbits whose bodies could thereby be experimented on to advance the Reich’s medical goals. ‘The sub-human is a biological creature, crafted by nature,’ according to Heinrich Himmler, ‘which has hands, legs, eyes, and mouth, even the semblance of a brain. Nevertheless, this terrible creature is only a partial human being….Not all of those who appear human an in fact so.’…the Reich had first sterilized and then euthanized nearly its entire population of mentally ill persons, including tens of thousands of children, under the Law for the Prevention of Genetically Diseased Offspring.” – Annie Jacobsen, Operation Paperclip

If you’re not familiar with Operation Paperclip, that is where the USA brought Nazi scientists over to work in the U.S. If you’ve heard of it it’s probably like this, with a lack of much detail. In fact, that’s why I read this book, to fill in the missing facts.

We brought over war criminals, people who by everything they did should have been in the Nuremberg trials, tried and hanged. We brought over scientists and doctors that experimented on human beings, including in ways that killed them from freezing experiments, explosive decompression, mustard gas research, and more. One survivor at Dachau reported how he was used for a seawater drinkability test. This included part of his liver being removed without the use of anesthesia to be analyzed.

We brought over zealot Nazis. We brought over SS officers. We brought over some of Hitler’s inner circle. Some of these scientists, hiding and whitewashing their past, became highly decorated individuals over here.

A big question I have, that I don’t have the answer too, to what degree did Nazi ideology spread and infect people over here? Or did these former Nazis really just abandon their old ways? Which of these seems more likely to you?

When some of these details came to be publicly known, Jacobsen quotes nuclear physicist Hans Bethe, and Dr. Henri Sack who wrote, “Was it wise, or even compatible with our moral standards to make this bargain, in light of the fact that many of the Germans, probably the majority, were die-hard Nazis?…Had the war been fought to allow Nazi ideology to creep into our education and scientific institutions by the back door?…Do we want science at any price?”

It wasn’t just scientists and doctors. We worked with their intelligence officers. That’s right, we gave more power to former Nazis who were great at being duplicitous and keeping secrets.

“A network of former Nazi intelligence agents, the majority of whom were members of the SS, began working…side by side with army intelligence officers,” writes Jacobsen. “According to documents kept classified for fifty-one years, relationships between [Major General and former head of Nazis’ intelligence against the Soviets Reinhard] Gehlen and [US Army Colonel William] Philp declined and became hostile as Philp finally realized the true nature of who he was dealing with. The Gehlan Organization was a murderous bunch, ‘Free-wheeling’ and out of control.”

This is where Operation Bluebird began, which led to Operation Artichoke, followed by MK-Ultra.

Of course, it was all just to better fight the communist Russians. They were going after their scientists too, so we had to play the escalation game.

Our own sociopaths wanted to win no matter the cost. We “needed” to do MK-Ultra. We “needed” to conduct experiments with biological and chemical warfare on our own populations. We “needed” to do much more.

“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.” ― Edmund Burke

There were good people that tried to stop Operation Paperclip, but not enough. Small details were leaked out to the press back then. Most of the information only came to light many, many years later. There are STILL classified details regarding many of these Paperclip members.

Yet the people that skirt the rules tend to get their way because the moral people live by those rules.

This is how evil is insidious and spreads over time.

We must understand evil if we want to make changes and that is what this article aims to do.

Culturally, there is a denial that evil even exists. That surely must help those who are evil operators. It’s easier for good men to do nothing if they don’t even perceive evil happening. (This makes me wonder if that idea was up-regulated.)

Or if the attention is misdirected away from the actual evil…

Something I’ve Not Mentioned Publicly Before

This is the second time I’ve opened up a post quoting Nazis. And so I’ll mention this…

My grandfather fought for Germany in WWII.

He wasn’t a Nazi nor SS or anything like that. He was a run-of-the-mill man who fought as an anti-aircraft gunner. He was captured and released after the war. He came over to America in the mid to late 50’s with my mother when she was around six or seven years old.

My grandfather on my father’s side also fought in WWII but for the Americans.

I’ve always thought this was interesting, but beyond these basic details I don’t know much. We didn’t really talk much about our history in my family.

But here’s another twist I did hear about. My grandfather’s grandfather had enough Jewish blood in him that he would have been sent to the camps, but he hid it well.

My grandfather got wrapped up in Nazi propaganda. This, despite his family not being of “pure blood”.

Maybe knowing this happened has helped me to get to this point where I see that we ALL easily get wrapped up in propaganda.

On the Sociopathy Spectrum

I don’t think that sociopathy or empathy are black and white things. Like pretty much everything, it is more useful to think of them on a spectrum where you can have more or less.

I’ve always had a hard time with “feelings”. Over the years I’ve done tons of work to the point where I am fairly balanced. Of course, there are more layers of the onion to be peeled in the future.

And I reflect on that often especially as of late.

I do believe in free will. I also see that we are so affected by circumstances in far more subtle ways that many realize.

And thus, I recognize that had my life happened just slightly differently, it could have completely changed my trajectory.

I was never physically or sexually abused. But if I was…what would I have become?

I had a period in high school where I had a morbid fascination with serial killers. Did I dare to think about actually becoming one?

Sure, some sociopaths may be born that way. Genetics likely plays some role though there is certainly no sociopath gene. (In fact, the whole idea of “gene” is pretty much wrong, but that’s a big topic for another day.)

I think much more so that sociopaths are made.

I think that lack of empathy can be taught. It can be culturally enforced. It can be rewarded.

…Or to put it another way natural empathy can be stomped out.

Personally, I feel like with just a few key events and/or choices I could have gone down a much darker path.

And this grappling with your own possibility of evil is something that not enough people do.

This is a deep, dark shadow (one that many people deny exist). Had I grown up in Germany in the 1920’s and 30’s…there’s a really good chance I would have become a Nazi too.

Jordan Peterson highly recommended the book “Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland“. It’s a fascinating read about how ordinary men were conscripted into doing work…which in time led to slaughtering Jews. It doesn’t excuse this behavior. Far from it. But it explores how ordinary men came to do such a thing. Some fought against it but that’s few and far between. Most took part. Some gleefully.

Maybe I wouldn’t have been a Nazi. Maybe I would have been one of the good guys. But there is certainly a chance I would not.

I recognize that. I sit with that. It gives me two things.

1. More compassion for those that perpetrate evil things knowing that they’re often victims of evil themselves.
   
2. It helps me to understand how evil can and does operate in this world.

Projection

Especially if we’re not aware of our own shadows we project them out onto other people. (I’ve been getting into more shadow work lately.)

They accuse of people of being anti-science when we actually want better science. And now…

Psychopathic traits linked to non-compliance with social distancing guidelines amid the coronavirus pandemic

This is a clue…

I agree that some people are being dicks about it. I do not think spitting on food or getting in people’s faces about masks is warranted. But notice what the broader message is here. Us vs. them.

J. Edgar Hoover wrote, “Yet the individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists. The American mind simply has not come to a realization of the evil which has been introduced into our midst. It rejects even the assumption that human creatures could espouse a philosophy which must ultimately destroy all that is good and decent.”

He was referring to Communism…and based on what we now know about him and his actions, he was projecting like crazy!

The Predator Class vs The Prey Class

I was thinking about this topic and then, boom, find yet another Daniel Schmachtenberger video discussing it. There’s a reason I like this guy…

I recommend watching the video, but I’ve transcribed most of it below. This is super important and seldom discussed.

*****

“I had a conversation several years ago with one of the most powerful, evil power brokers in the world. Long one-on-one where I was actually surprised at how much he kind of both was inviting me into his world and opening up about it. And the way he framed it, it goes like this. I’ll just do it briefly cause it’s important.

“It’s like, look, humans are animals. Animals are either predators or prey. Predators don’t feel bad when they kill prey. If you feel bad, when the prey humans die, it’s cause you’re a prey human and you won’t run the world and the apex predator will run the world. They will be the thing that determines the shape of an overall ecosystem.

“And whether you like what apex predators do or not, doesn’t determine, it doesn’t matter at all to the fact that apex predators will be the ones who run the world. So the only question is whether you have what it takes to make it into that group or not.

“And so that’s the inexorable argument, right? Power in the form of predatory power is inexorable. Can’t do anything about it. It’s always going to win. Well, if that’s the case and I can’t effectively fight against it, that just binds all kinds of moral possibilities as just stupid and naive.

“So then the next part was power as virtue. Which he said, and it’s actually good that the apex predators are the ones who run the world because they’re the ones who are steely-eyed and real and grounded enough to understand how shit works. And the world is actually kind of brutal and people who just don’t get how it fucking works can’t guide stuff. They’ll make it worse. Sometimes you got to put a head on a spike in the yard to keep everybody else from being assholes. And so it goes from power as inexorable to power as virtue, and then some people stop there.

“And then the last step is feeling good about exercising your own power over because it says you are a part of that class, which becomes power as fetish, which is the movement from sociopathy to sadism. When you actually fantasize, fetishize the exercising of it.

“Now of course, everything he was saying was utter gibberish. And it’s important to know that. And I didn’t bring it up with him because I knew that wasn’t relevant in that moment. I was basically getting more information. Like blue whale is neither predator nor pray in a traditional sense. Neither is an elephant. The apex predator is lower on the food chain than a virus or a parasite or a mosquito in many ways. You’re pretending that there’s this thing that isn’t really there. And you are not acknowledging that the arms race that has always won, self terminates pretty soon, because when you externalization and war, it actually destroys everything. And so basically, it’s gibberish, but it’s compelling enough gibberish that if you kind of want to do it anyways, it’s plausible deniability.”

*****

1. Power as inexorable. (In other words, inevitable, impossible to stop.)
2. Power as virtue. (In other words, moral excellence, that is literally inverting what most would say is moral.)
3. Power as fetish. (In other words, an object of irrational reverence or obsessive devotion.)

Welcome to the evil worldview!

These are some ways that a significant portion of people see the world. I found this very powerful because of the layer of values that some sociopaths can operate from.

It helps me to understand a “world perception” that could drive the behavior we see playing out in the world, in corrupt institutions.

No One Thinks They’re Evil

I don’t really remember the movie all that much, but this quote stood out for me. I remember it now despite watching the movie once probably twenty years ago.

“No matter what you do, no matter how awful, no-one ever thinks that they’re a bad person.” – Matt Damon in The Talented Mr. Ripley

There is always rationalization for everything that is done.

…Therefore rationality can NOT be our ultimate guide.

Here is how rationalization can work. Power is the only game in town so might as well play it. Well, since the game is power the person who is best at it is the best most virtuous person. Since it’s all about power let’s do things just for the sake of power.

The Russians will get advanced Nazi science and technology and kill us Americans, so we need to get them instead, despite whatever they did in the past. We need to spend tons of money on biological, chemical and nuclear warfare in preparation.

Black men wouldn’t go in for syphilis treatment anyway therefore we’ll study the course of the disease and never treat them. What science gains from actually blocking these men from being treated, because our assumption was racist and wrong, will be worth it. (Tuskegee)

Our drugs our saving people’s lives. Never mind that we statistically manipulated data to get them approved or sell them for non-approved uses, bribing doctors to do so. On the whole, we’re helping people more than we’re harming them.

Yes, we can always find a rational reason to explain away doing evil.

That doesn’t mean it isn’t evil.

So with this in mind let’s look at one of the biggest boogeymen right now.

Amoral George Soros

Is George Soros behind Antifa through his Open Societies Foundation? Is he sending stacks of bricks at protest sites to incite violent riots? Is he funding Black Lives Matter as a part of a color revolution?

I don’t know! The little I’ve seen suggests the possibility, but I have yet to come across hard proof and I’m doing my best not to leap to conclusions, recognizing that much of this could very-well be propaganda.

I have not dug deeply into this man. But here is what I know. This interview alone speaks enough to me about the morality of this man. I’d recommend watching the video, but I’ll pull quotes from it below.

“In the last two years you’ve been blamed for financial collapse Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, Japan and Russia,” says journalist Steve Kroft.

“All of the above,” replies Soros with a smirk and a bit of a laugh. (Notice the body language as he talks about some devastating things.) “I am basically there to make money. I cannot and do not look at the social consequences of what I do.”

Later he says, “I don’t feel guilty because I’m engaged in an amoral activity which is not meant to have anything to do with guilt.”

In other words, I won’t admit to there being morality involved. The money part is amoral. What that in turn causes does not matter. Therefore, I am not guilty because there are no morals involved with which to be guilty. Big rationalizations!

“Whatever his motivations, no one can accuse him of greed. He’s backed away from the day to day operations of his businesses and is giving away his billions now with the same determination he made them in places like Haiti, a country that has less money in the bank than he does.”

Here comes the widespread belief that philanthropy automatically makes you a good person. See Robber Baron Philanthropists for more. Don’t forget, Jeffrey Epstein was trying to rebrand himself as a philanthropist. (Did you see the news, they finally arrested Ghislaine Maxwell!)

That’s one of the problems inherent in making money into your God or even close to it. Then if people are giving away so much of it they MUST be good, right?  If money is god then those that give away are godly.

Kroft mentions this, “Like Carnegie, JP Morgan and the Rockefellers he amassed billions through ruthless business decisions only to turn around and give away most of his fortune to advance his own personal philosophy.”

Is this what a moral person does? Thankfully, there is a movement today called by many names such as conscious capitalism, evolved enterprise, etc. People are beginning to recognize that the “robber baron” your way to the top, only to about-face later on, is not an ideal way to go. It’s not a moral way to go.

But notice that last line. To advance his own personal philosophy. What if you disagree in part or in whole with that philosophy? Is it a moral philosophy? Or is it an amoral philosophy?

Back to Nazi’s, we see that Soros was a Hungarian Jew that posed as a Christian. He was able to avoid arrest, meanwhile he or his father was involved in confiscating property from other Jews.

When asked about this, he replies, “There was no sense that I shouldn’t be there…Well, actually in a funny way it’s just like in markets. If I weren’t there, if I wasn’t doing it, but somebody else would be taking it away anyhow. Whether I was there or not, the property was being taken away. So I had no role in taking away that property. So I had no sense of guilt.”

The game of power is there. I might as well be good at it. I’m not guilty because power is a virtue. If not me, then simply someone else. This is a cop out to say that someone else would be doing it anyway.

Amorality = Immorality

I’ve been talking about these words, so let’s make sure we’re clear.

• Morality = The quality of being in accord with standards of right or good conduct.
• Amorality = Lack or absence of morality
• Immorality = The character of being immoral; transgression of the moral law; immoral thought or action; wickedness; dissoluteness; licentiousness.

Kroft says, “At the center of George Soros there’s an inherent contradiction…On one hand you’re the capitalist who does not care about the social consequences of his act. And on the other hand you’re a philanthropist who only cares about the social consequences. How do you resolve the two?”

“Recognizing that as a competitor I’ve got to compete to win. As a human being, I am concerned about the society in which I live,” replies Soros. “It’s one person at one time who engages in amoral activities, and the rest of the time tries to be moral.”

Is there such a thing as amoral activities? He’s talking about playing the markets. Sure, for you or me to play in the markets there isn’t really an outcome outside of what happens for with the money. There is no inherent morality in such. When you get to the economy-crashing-scale you cannot claim it’s amoral. It has very real impacts on people and the world. Again, saying it is amoral is a cop out.

Notice his language too. One person who engages in amoral activities and the rest of the time TRIES to be moral.

If you’re saying your decisions are amoral, like playing the markets, then they are not guided by morals. They are guided by making money. If the desire is to win at the money game, then morality will be trampled upon in doing so simply because these are sometimes competing aims. Therefore, amorality leads to immorality.

Rest assured; I’m not saying you have to believe in God to have morality. There are atheists such as Sam Harris that are trying to figure out a way to establish morality. There’s been humanism for quite some time. So I’m not saying we all have to agree to a certain belief structure.

But can we all agree that we do need morality? And that the “Golden Rule” tends to be a good place to start?

With atheism and materialism tends to become a belief in the universe and life just being random. (I say this as someone who previously believed in these things or as I think of it now, bought the propaganda.) If it is random then there is no meaning beyond the meaning we give things. If there is no meaning then there is no right or wrong, no good and evil.

Steve Kroft asks if he believes if Soros is religious or believes in God. “No.” Kroft says “Soros told us he believes God was created by man and not the other way around. Which may be why he believes he can smooth out the world’s imperfections.”

While I haven’t read the book, there is an biography from Michael Kaufman titled, “Soros: The Life and Times of a Messianic Billionaire“.

Messianic. Messiah. Do you desire to have this man leading the way into the future?

Do you trust he is using his power (in the form of money and influence) for moral purposes that align with your own?

Is it possible that he is manipulating peoples and governments the same way he manipulated markets while thinking it’s just an amoral activity?

Once again, to deny that evil exists, we’re pushing it into the collective shadow, which allows it to flourish all the better.

Let’s equate sociopathy with amorality. You don’t feel empathy. You don’t have a conscience. If you establish power as your virtue, then you’ll engage in what others see as immorality to get there. That’s your guiding north star.

I cannot tell you that 100% for sure that Soros is one of these people. I’m not trying to force beliefs on you. But based on this interview alone I do NOT think he is a good person and I am troubled by what I see.

A Hilarious Aside

Also quoted in this interview is Jim Grant, editor of Grant’s Interest Rate Observer and Wall Street Analysis.

First a serious quote. “This man is a carnivore of the first order.”

Carnivore of the first order would be equivalent to apex predator going back to what Schmachtenberger said.

But here’s the golden quote…

“George Soros, in a way, is Donald Trump without the humility.”

Wow! Very funny given Trump’s position today. That quote aged well (or not so well depending on your perspective)!

Smart Criminals Make The Laws

Look, I get that George Soros is used as a boogeyman for conservatives. That there are lies spouted about him in order to push right-wing agendas. I’m not denying that that has taken place because, after all, others are playing the same power game too.

Wading through the muddied waters and getting to the bottom of the swamp is extremely tough to do.

There are predator class billionaires on both sides of the aisle. The Koch brothers would be the equivalent boogeyman for the left who peddled influence in much the same way.

Remember in a previous video, Schmachtenberger said, “I don’t find that most successful politicians that I’ve encountered near the top of the power actually believe red vs. blue ideology. They just believe in the game of power and signal red vs. blue ideology as part of their mimetic warfare to control people that are going to vote for them.”

And while billionaires certainly have their leanings, they tend to fund both parties because they understand what that gets them.

Daniel also mentions in the longer version of the above video, that “Dumb criminals break laws. Smart criminals make laws.”

Think about that for a moment. Really give it some thought. We see it play out in spades. That’s what lobbyists are all about! That’s what regulatory capture and the revolving door accomplishes.

What about when you play the international game where you can use the laws of different countries to your advantage? (In the 60 Minutes interview, it shows how Soros operates in low tax and regulation countries specifically, while saying there should be more regulations! He’s just playing the game to win.)

As of the start of this month, Soros has a $8.3 billion net worth, with his Open Society Foundations having been given $18 billion in 2018, with current assets of $8.4 billion.

That’s a lot of money that can affect a lot of change. I’m not saying we should automatically assume anything.

But given what I know about apex predators, sociopathy, and the widespread corruption going on in our world, I am extremely suspect. I think this interview alone speaks volumes about this man.

Bill Gates is another messianic billionaire who doesn’t believe in God and made his way to the top by ruthless (amoral/immoral) business practices.

Do you automatically trust that he is being truly moral now? Does his personal philosophy that he is propagating through philanthropy match up with yours? Not for me.

Nazi Medicine

We brought Nazi doctors over here that conducted human experiments.

IG Farben was a chemical and pharmaceutical company where some of these doctors worked. They relied on slave labor from the concentration camps and produced Zyklon B used in the gas chambers.

After the war some of the executives were convicted, but many were not. The company was broken up into what today are Bayer, BASF, Sanofi and Agfa.

I still have a lot more digging to do into these companies and their literal Nazi past.

Yet I already know of some clear examples of “medical sociopathy” such as Bayer’s selling of HIV infected blood products for which they paid tens of millions of dollars. Of course, “the company accepts no responsibility” and “continues to insist it has always acted responsibly and ethically.”

Just like Monsanto, which is now owned by Bayer. They’re paying out $10.9 billion for Roundup causing cancer. CEO Werner Baumann says “the Roundup settlement is the right action at the right time for Bayer to bring a long period of uncertainty to an end.” They deny any responsibility and even the cancer link.

Why do I bring these up?

How much of our medical system is infected by sociopathic and evil ideas? Because we need to see this to look at today’s events. It’s not just careless indifference in the chasing of money. That’s a part of it, but it doesn’t explain everything.

No, many times actions are taken that are willfully killing people. So I want to talk about that in relation to a few things going on.

Medical Malpractice Deaths

“They’re not dying of COVID. Yes people are going to die of COVID, I know this, I’m not like a new grad student. I am literally saying they’re murdering these people.” This comes from an ICU nurse, Nicole Sirotek, that was working on the frontlines.

“What I need is someone to help me save these people from being killed from gross negligence and medical mismanagement and no-one is listening to me.”

And on topic for this post, “It’s like if we were in Nazi Germany and they were taking the Jews to a gas chamber and I’m the one saying, ‘Hey that’s not okay. This is wrong.’ And then everyone tells me, ‘Hang in there. You’re doing a great job. You can’t save everybody.’…I’m pretty sure when you defibrillate someone with a heart rate of 40 and a stable rhythm that’s murder…And I’m pretty sure when you put someone’s PEEP (Positive End Expiratory Pressure on a ventilator) up to 25 and PEEP doesn’t go past like 15 or 20 and you blow someone’s lungs out and they die – that’s murder.”

Nursing Home Deaths

On May 26^th, Forbes reports: The Most Important Coronavirus Statistic: 42% Of U.S. Deaths Are From 0.6% Of The Population

That population is those living in nursing homes and assisted living facilities. And 42% could be undercounted. “States like New York exclude from their nursing home death tallies those who die in a hospital, even if they were originally infected in a long-term care facility.”

States like New York, New Jersey, California and Michigan ordered active COVID19 patients to go to nursing homes after discharge from hospital. Governor Cuomo said “They don’t have a right to object. That is the rule and that is the regulation and they have to comply with that.” Weeks later after thousands of deaths that order was partially rescinded.

This has led Senator Charles Grassley and Representative Greg Walden to write a letter to Inspector General Christi Grimm on June 29^th to investigate this.

Was this just a bad call, relying on some bureaucratic rule?

Or was there actual mal-intent? I do not know the answer, but I agree it needs investigation.

And now thousands of nursing home residents are simply being evicted. NY Times reports, “According to three Lakeview [nursing home] employees, [an 88 year old man with dementia eviction] came as the nursing home was telling staff members to try to clear out less-profitable residents to make room for a new class of customers who would generate more revenue: patients with Covid-19.”

Hydroxychloroquine Update

I covered the controversial drug Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in my Science as Propaganda post. Go back and read it if you’ve haven’t.

To recap, doctors and scientists the world over are saying this dirt cheap existing drug works, especially when combined with zinc and the antibiotic, Azithromycin. But some scientific studies are saying that it doesn’t work and may even be deadly. The data for one such study, published in the Lancet, was completely made up, literally pulling data out of thin air. Damage was done even though less than two weeks later this paper was retracted.

As science goes more research is being done. There is good, legitimate research. And then there is agenda-driven research. Here’s some new data I didn’t cover before on the latter.

On June 15^th, the FDA revoked emergency use authorization of HCQ and CQ. “FDA has concluded that, based on this new information and other information discussed in the attached memorandum, it is no longer reasonable to believe that oral formulations of HCQ and CQ may be effective in treating COVID-19, nor is it reasonable to believe that the known and potential benefits of these products outweigh their known and potential risks.”

So let’s look at some of the agenda driven science.

To of the main ones are the WHO’s Solidarity trials and the UK’s Recovery trial.

The problem is that these trials are using excessive, deadly doses. The WHO’s own information shows this. A 1979 paper by consultant H. Weniger mentions that 1.5 to 2 grams of HCQ may be fatal. Around this amount is what is being used, the Recovery trial specifically 2.4 grams in the first day.

Meanwhile, French doctor Raoult was using 600mg daily for up to ten days with his patients. Of 1061 Covid19 patients all over 74 years old, only 8 died, a mortality rate of 0.75%.

Meryl Nass, MD says “Excessive, dangerous HCQ dosing continues to be used in WHO’s Solidarity trials. These trials are not, in fact, testing the benefits of HCQ on Covid-19, but rather are testing whether patients survive toxic, non-therapeutic doses.” If you want more detail see this article here.

Only when this information was repeatedly pointed out was the HCQ arm of the trial stopped. They did it without announcing this information.

So let’s think about this for a second. Do you think these were honest mistakes? It was just an accident to use massive doses of a drug that has been widely used for decades safely at lower doses out of the blue?

Or do you think that they set out to prove the HCQ did not work, so that Gilead could make money off of Remdesivir now, and that a vaccine later on becomes the savior?

As you might expect by this point, the Gates Foundation is implicated in this research, along with the Wellcome Trust for funding the Recovery trial. As for the WHO trial, well Gates is now the #1 financial backer of the WHO.

Understand what this means:

They were not only ALLOWING people to die from COVID19 due to poorly treated them.

But they were in fact KILLING people by purposefully overdosing them on drugs all to prove this drug doesn’t work so that their agendas move forward.

The Vaccine before the Vaccine?

Last week I published how University of Tennesse was mandating Flu vaccines now and the COVID vaccine once it is available. Shortly, after this I came across this…

CDC, drugmakers boost flu vaccine doses amid fears of an unprecedented respiratory illness season

The CDC bought 7 million doses directly from manufacturers (you did know they’re the biggest customer of the vaccine companies they regulate, right?) spending $100 million to do so. This is fourteen times the normal 500,000 doses they normally buy.

IG Farben offspring Sanofi is one flu vaccine provider. The industry is producing 189 million doses total, up from 170 million last year.

The reasoning is interesting. “Getting a flu shot does not protect against the coronavirus, but disease experts said reducing episodes of flu could prove pivotal in freeing up space in hospitals and medical offices to deal with covid-19, the disease caused by the coronavirus.”…because all the hospitals were so heavily overloaded previously, right?

And did you know, as the Guardian reports, that “Higher influenza vaccination rates could help prevent a future pandemic by exposing new viruses like Covid-19, which was probably circulating much earlier than December 2019 but was mistaken for flu, an expert has said.”

They want you to read that you should get your flu vaccine. I read that this thing was with us well before March 2020 and therefore all this shutdown continuation and masking up is nonsense.

There’s an interesting study just released last month from the Department of Defense that shows that those that got a flu vaccine, while getting less flu, were susceptible to 36% more coronaviruses, due to something called virus interference.

“Vaccine derived virus interference was significantly associated with coronavirus and human metapneumovirus; however, significant protection with vaccination was associated not only with most influenza viruses, but also parainfluenza, RSV, and non-influenza virus coinfections.”

The data is from 2017-2018 so does not involve SARS-CoV2 but other types of coronaviruses. The fact-checkers want to dismiss this of course. The funny thing is they don’t actually address the data in the study head on…because they can’t. But if they were honest, it would be cause for concern and more study, rather than blanket denial.

It’s not the only evidence we have that flu vaccines may increase some issues. This Children’s Health Defense article dives into several other studies. None are conclusive but lead to an interesting hypothesis.

What if the flu vaccine DOES increase susceptibility to coronaviruses including SARS-CoV2?

Then ramping up production, suggesting and mandating that people get it would cause even more harm.

If we understand evil, that some powerful people not only don’t care if you die, but might actually enjoy the fact, we have to consider this possibility. What would this accomplish? Three things:

1. Sales of flu vaccine right now for profit.
2. Expanding mandates for flu vaccine now for more control.
3. If more people die of COVID later on during flu season, more fear, more restictions, more mandates are all forthcoming.

Do we have any evidence that the flu vaccine impacts COVID19? Just a hypothesis that needs to be investigated further but remember all the deaths in Italy? In September 2019, a new flu shot, VIQCC, which has four viruses, was widely rolled out.

And back in March, Deputy chief medical officer for England said that people who get the flu shot are in the high risk group and should isolate for 12 weeks to avoid the coronavirus.

Oh yeah, and “Pandemic 2” seems to already be on the horizon. A new swine-flu strain with ‘pandemic potential’ was just found circulating in Chinese pigs. Just stirring up more fear?

Taking Occum’s to Hanlon’s Razor

Hanlon’s razor states, “Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.”

Look, I know most people are not in on these evil schemes. I attribute most of it to stupidity. (Or sometimes better explained as people being under the influence of propaganda and not realizing it.)

But how many coincidence’s until we get to the point of realizing there IS MALICE involved? At some high powered levels?

At what point does Occum’s razor take over, you know as the simpler explanation?

Hydroxychloroquine, for sure. Some know. Some are intentionally killing people.

The other stuff, maybe, just maybe it’s a bunch of coincidences.

You really have to see the wider picture to get that there is evil going on. Any single example can be denied, explained away. But the pattern over time cannot.

There is evil in the world.

1. It exists (though the exact nature of it is a whole different, even bigger topic)
2. It is more widespread than most realize
3. It is insidious, meaning subtle and expanding over time
4. It crawls up hierarchies and then dominates them

And if we don’t understand how it operates, we have no chance of stopping it. If all it takes is for good people to say nothing, to do nothing, then evil thrives.

There is very little chance of this happening if we don’t face our personal shadows. If we don’t look into ourselves and see how the possibility (and hopefully only the possibility!) of evil exists.

With more men and women doing that, we’ll be equipped to facing the collective shadow of evil.